We know why LABELS are unhelpful. They are shortcut descriptions for how we feel (usually anthropomorphic) and not what the behavior actually is. The word may not even mean the same thing to other people as it does to us. And labels for behaviors tend to come with cookie cutter solutions to change those behaviors.
So what should we be doing instead?
Updated poster:
"Operationalizing" a label is not always an easy task. You still have to come up with the best words to describe the label word, topographically and functionally, for it to make sense to the reader/listener. For me, the easiest way to operationalize a behavior is to DRAW IT.
I may also do a version with cats.
This is a fascinating take on behavior labeling! It reminds me of the rice purity test — just like those scores can oversimplify complex experiences, labels often miss the nuances of behavior. Drawing behaviors could definitely provide a clearer, more nuanced understanding. Looking forward to seeing your cat version!
The intricate topography of a tiger's stripes is not just nature's artwork; it's a masterpiece of function. These distinct patterns help camouflage them in their habitats, making them efficient hunters. Much like the brushstrokes on a canvas, the stripes merge seamlessly with their surroundings tiger art images, illustrate the harmonious blend of form and function in the wild.